Combinatorial Optimization Problems

  • Prof. (Dr). Deepak Raj Panipat Institute of Engineering & Technology, Panipat, Haryana, India
Keywords: combinatorial, optimization, problems, model, heuristic

Abstract

Combinatorial optimization problems are often too complex to be solved within reasonable time limits by exact methods, in spite of the theoretical guarantee that such methods will ultimately obtain an optimal solution. Instead, heuristic methods, which do not offer a convergence guarantee, but which have greater flexibility to take advantage of special properties of the search space, are commonly a preferred alternative. The standard procedure is to craft a heuristic method to suit the particular characteristics of the problem at hand, exploiting to the extent possible the structure available. Such tailored methods, however, typically have limited usefulness in other problems domains.

An alternative to this problem specific solution approach is a more general methodology that recasts a given problem into a common modeling format, permitting solutions to be derived by a common, rather than tailor-made, heuristic method. Because such general purpose heuristic approaches forego the opportunity to capitalize on domain-specific knowledge, they are characteristically unable to provide the effectiveness or efficiency of special purpose approaches.  Indeed, they are typically regarded to have little value except for dealing with small or simple problems.

This paper reports on recent work that calls this commonly held view into question.  We describe how a particular unified modeling framework, coupled with latest advances in heuristic search methods, makes it possible to solve problems from a wide range of important model classes.

References

1. Alidaee, B, G. Kochenberger, and A. Ahmadian, “0-1 Quadratic Programming Approach for the Optimal Solution of Two Scheduling Problems,” International Journal of Systems Science, 25, 401-408, 1994.
2. Amini, M., B. Alidaee, G. Kochenberger, “A Scatter Search Approach to Unconstrained Quadratic Binary Programs,” New Methods in Optimization, Cone, Dorigo, and Glover, eds., McGraw-Hill, 317-330, 1999.
3. Borchers, B. and J. Furman, “A Two-Phase Exact Algorithm for Max-SAT and Weighted Max SAT,” J. of Combinatorial Optimization, 2,299-306 (1999).
4. Boros, E., and P. Hammer, “The Max-Cut Problem and Quadratic 0-1 Optimization, Polyhedral Aspects, Relaxations and Bounds,” Annals of OR, 33,151-225 (1991)
5. Boros, E. and P. Hammer, “ Pseudo-Boolean Optimization,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, 123(1-3), 155-225 (2002)
6. Boros, E, P. Hammer, and X, Sun, “The DDT Method for Quadratic 0-1 Minimization,” RUTCOR Research Center, RRR 39-89, 1989.
7. Boros, E. and A. Prekopa, “Probabilistic Bounds and Algorithms for the Maximum Satisfiability Problem,” Annals of OR, 21 (1989), pp. 109-126.
8. Bourjolly, J.M., P. Gill, G. Laporte, and H. Mercure, “A Quadratic 0/1 Optimization Algorithm for the Maximum Clique and Stable Set Problems,” Working paper, University of Montreal, (1994).
9. Chardaire, P, and A. Sutter, “A Decomposition Method for Quadratic Zero-One Programming,” Management Science, 41:4, 704-712, 1994.
10. Cho, J-D, S. Raje, and M. Sarrafzadeh, “Fast Approximation Algorithms on Maxcut, K-Coloring, and K-Color Ordering for VLSI Applications,” IEE Transactions on Computers, 47, 1253-1266, 1998
11. De Simone, C. M. Diehl, M. Junger, P. Mutzel, G. Reinelt, and G. Rinaldi, ‘Exact Ground State4s of Ising Spin Glasses: New Experimental Results with a Branch and Cut Algorithm,” Journal of Statistical Physics, 80, 487-496 (1995)
12. Du, D. and P. Pardalos, (ed), Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization, (4 volumes), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998-99.
13. Gallo, G, P. Hammer, and B. Simeone, “Quadratic Knapsack Problems,” Mathematical Programming, 12, 132-149, 1980.
14. Glover, F, and M. Laguna, “Tabu Search,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
15. Glover, F., “A Template for Scatter Search and Path Relinking,” School of Business, University of Colorado, Technical Report, February 1998.
16. Glover, F., B. Alidaee, C. Rego, and G. Kochenberger, “One-Pass Heuristics for Large-Scale Unconstrained Binary Quadratic Programs,” EJOR 137, pp. 272-287, 2002.
17. Glover, F., G. Kochenberger, B. Alidaee, and M.M. Amini, “Tabu with Search Critical Event Memory: An Enhanced Application for Binary Quadratic Programs,” In: Meta¬Heuristics: Advances and Trends in Local Search Paradigms for Optimization, (Eds.) S. Voss, S. Martello, I. Osman, and C. Roucairol. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston, 1999.
18. Glover, F., G. Kochenberger., and B. Alidaee, “Adaptive Memory Tabu Search for Binary Quadratic Programs,” Management Science, 44:3, 336-345, 1998.
19. Grotschel, M., M. Junger, and G. Reinelt, “An Application of Combinatorial Optimization to Statistical Physics and Circuit Layout Design,” Operations Research, Vol.36, #3, May-June, (1988), pp. 493-513.
20. Hammer, P., P. Hansen, and B. Simone, “Upper Planes of Quadratic 0/1 Functions and Stability in Graphs,” Nonlinear Programming 4, O. Mangasarian, R. Meyer, and S. Robinson (eds), Academic Press, New York, (1981), pp. 395-414.
21. Hammer, P., and S. Rudeanu, Boolean Methods in Operations Research, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1968.
22. Hansen, P.B., “Methods of Nonlinear 0-1 Programming,” Annals Discrete Math, vol. 5, pp.53-70, 1979.
23. Hansen, P, B. Jaumard., and V. Mathon, “Constrained Nonlinear 0-1 Programming,” INFORMS Journal on Computing, 5:2, 97-119, 1993.
24. Hansen, P. and B. Jaumard, “Algorithms for the Maximum Satisfiability Problem,” Computing, 44, 279-303 (1990).
25. Iasemidis, L. D., D. S. Shiau, J.C. Sackellares, and P. Pardalos, “Transition to Epileptic Seizures: Optimization,” DIMACS Series in Discrete Math and Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 55, (2000), pp. 55-73.
26. Joseph, A. “A Concurrent Processing Framework for the Set Partitioning Problem,” Computers & Operations Research, 29, 1375-1391, 2002.
27. Kochenberger, G., F. Glover, B. Alidaee, and C. Rego, “An Unconstrained Quadratic Binary Programming Approach to the Vertex Coloring Problem,” Working Paper, University of Colorado at Denver, 2002.
28. Krarup, J, and A. Pruzan, “Computer Aided Layout Design,” Mathematical Programming Study, 9, 75-94, 1978.
29. Laughunn, D.J, “Quadratic Binary programming,” Operations Research, 14, 454-461, 1970.
30. McBride, R.D., and J.S. Yormack, “An Implicit Enumeration Algorithm for Quadratic Integer Programming,” Management Science, 26, 282-296, 1980.
31. Mingozzi, A., M. Boschetti, S. Ricciardelli and L. Blanco, “A Set Partitioning Approach to the Crew Scheduling Problem,” Operations Research, 47 (6) 873- 888, 1999.
32. Palubeckis, G. “A Heuristic-Branch and Bound Algorithm for the Unconstrained Quadratic Zero-One Programming Problem,” Computing, pp. 284-301, (1995).
33. Pardalos, P, and G.P. Rodgers, “Computational Aspects of a Branch and Bound Algorithm for Quadratic Zero-one Programming,” Computing, 45, 131-144, 1990.
34. Pardalos, P, and G.P. Rodgers, “A Branch and Bound Algorithm for Maximum Clique problem,” Computers & OR, 19, 363-375, 1992.
35. Pardalos, P, and J. Xue, “The Maximum Clique Problem,” The Journal of Global Optimization, 4, 301-328, 1994.
36. Phillips, A.T., and J.B. Rosen, “A Quadratic Assignment Formulation of the Molecular Conformation Problem,” The Journal of Global Optimization, 4, 229-241, 1994.
37. Rosenberg, I.G., “0-1 Optimization and Non-linear Programming.” Revue Francaise d’Automatique, d’Informatique et de Rescherche Operationnelle, (S\’erie Blueu) 2, 95-97, (1972).
38. Tsuda, N., “Fault-Tolerant Processor Arrays Using Additional Bypass LinkingAllocated by Graph-Node Coloring,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, 49, 431-442, 2000.
39. Witsgall, C., “Mathematical Methods of site Selection for Electronic System (EMS),” NBS Internal Report, 1975.
Published
2021-12-22
How to Cite
Raj, P. (Dr). D. (2021). Combinatorial Optimization Problems. CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL THEORY AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2(12), 75-86. Retrieved from https://cajmtcs.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJMTCS/article/view/157
Section
Articles