A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF INTUITIONIST FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEMATICS
Abstract
The paper is a study of the intuitionist foundations of mathematic. It is work in the epistemology of mathematics. Hence, it is warranted by the need to ascertain the epistemic status of mathematical statements. Are they synthetic or a priori or synthetic a priori statements, as the case may be? The objective of the study is to evaluate the responses of intuitionist to these questions, so as to ascertain whether they could set to rest the controversies in the philosophy of mathematics. To achieve this objective, the method of content analysis has been adopted. This method is consistent with a qualitative research design. The major text selected for analysis are works of intuitionist mathematicians and other philosophers of mathematics. It has been submitted in the study, that although intuitionism is known for its proposal of the epistemology of subjective construction of mathematical entities, its system is inconsistent because of its dependence on ontological pluralism that leads to crude empiricism and the epistemological crisis of object absolutism.
References
2. Dummett, Michael. Elements of Intuitionism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.
3. Heyting, Arend. Intuitionism: An Introduction. New York: North- Holland Publishing, 1980.
4. Jech, Thomas. Set Theory. New York: Academic Press, 1987.
5. Korner, Stephan. The Philosophy of Mathematics: An Introduction. London: Hutchinson and Company, 1971.
6. Russell, Berttrand. The Principles of Mathematics. London: Routledge, 1992.
7. Whitehead, Alfred, N. and Russell, Bertrand. Principia Mathematica Vol 1. London: Cambridge University Press, 1978.